Most of my spiritual conversations over the last several weeks have swirled around a common question: How do you read the Bible? Some of these dialogs have stemmed from the social media firestorm surrounding musician Michael Gungor’s admission that he does not believe some of Genesis’ accounts are literal. Others have been private confessions from believers who secretly believe in evolution (a broad statement, to be sure), but are scared to death to voice this among their Evangelical peer groups. And still others are trying to reconcile inconsistencies found within scripture, now digging deep for contextual understanding.

In all cases, I commend Christians everywhere for their hunger for learning. We must be people that dig deep, and then dig deep again, fostered by healthy communities that endorse free thinking and inspire “walking out [one’s] own salvation with fear and trembling.” Changing doctrine is not a sign of weakness, but of confession that we don’t have it right, and God does.

No matter your sentiments or beliefs, the Bible plays a critical roll in all of our development: our faith must be shaped by the cannon of tradition past and by the counsel of spiritual leaders present. Which leads to an all-important question:

How do you read the Bible?

Below, I’ve pasted four very keen points from Joshua Graves, the lead minister for the Otter Creek Church in suburban Nashville, TN. I’d suggest reading his preface on the original post as well, since his four-point list is actually a part of a much larger conversation, both presently and historically.

These four perspectives are incredibly helpful both in knowing where you’re at and helping determine where others are coming from when they purport seemingly irrational conclusions when held in context to your own.

Pastor Joshua Graves:

VIEW #1: FUNDAMENTALIST or BASIC (The Bible is read as a rule-book for living a godly life before a watching judge.)

God is a judge with holy (sometimes angry) and wrathful disposition towards sinful humanity. Jesus saved humanity. Though he loves us, God’s anger burns towards humanity because of continual evil and wicked ways.
The Holy Bible was given via dictation theory or celestial possession. The Holy Spirit literally dictated every single detail. The autographs (original sections of the Bible) and copies are perfect, infallible and inerrant. Every word in Scripture is historically, theologically accurate. The Bible is accessible for any person to understand in a rational and logical approach. It’s not enough to say the Bible in “inspired and authoritative” . . . one must also believe the Bible is infallible, inerrant, and perfect. The Bible is God’s direct instruction manual to all people for all time for how to live before God.

Some of the key players/voices: John Piper, Mark Driscoll, Southern Baptist Convention, Albert Mohler, authors of the Left Behind Series (Jenkins and LaHaye).

VIEW #2: EVANGELICAL (The Bible is read as a collection of timeless principles for morality and conversion in a dark and corrupt world.)

God is a judge and father with a major dilemma that only Jesus can resolve.
The Bible is the Word of God for the people of God. It contains the timeless truths of God’s heart that need to be communicated and shared with all people. While the copies of the Biblical manuscripts might possess some tension/uncertainty, the autographs (originals) are perfect, infallible, and inerrant. The primary role of the Bible is to save people from their sin and hell, providing the road map for any person to spend eternity with God. God’s primary way of communicating to humanity is through the sacred scriptures. It’s the most important tool we have for understanding God. Some in this camp will greatly stress the power of the Spirit to use the timeless truths of the Bible to provide a practical guide for everyday decisions.

Some key voices/leaders: Rick Warren, Bill Hybels, Andy Stanley, Tim Keller, Max Lucado, Billy Graham, Beth Moore, Joyce Meyer, Joel Osteen, T.D. Jakes.

VIEW #3: THIRD WAY (The Bible is read an unfolding drama inviting all people to participate in the work of God in the world.)

God is the creative father who seeks to pull all women and men out of darkness into living the Kingdom of God now in preparation for the fullness of the new heavens and the new earth.

Because the church came before the New Testament, this group is inclined to call the Bible the word of God and reserve the phrase the “Word of God” for only Jesus (word does not = Word). Rather, the Bible reveals the Word. The Bible is the word of God in that it is trust-worthy, powerful, and effective in leading people to a living encounter with the power and mystery of Jesus in the world. It is the sacred drama of God, in which we are mere B actors, and Jesus is the main character. While God is revealed in a myriad of ways (creation, art, music, friendship), scripture is unique in that it derives its authority from the witness of catholic orthodox stream of disciples and the local church. The power of the Spirit is at work taking ink on a page, and bringing us closer to the Jesus who holds all creation together. The Bible is the mirror that shows us who God is and who we are. It is not to be worshiped or made an idol as it did not create us, sustain us, die for us, etc. It’s simply the tool God uses in conjunction with all of the other revelations to bring us closer to God’s intent for the world: faithful discipleship, resistance to the powers of this present age (communal). Christ’ presence in the world is both powerful and mysterious and the Bible is a key tool God uses in that endeavor of discovery. This group resists using infallible and inerrant because a) they are not words that show up in Scripture and b) are tied to stale debates between faith and science. This group takes seriously the role of the Bible as it relates to inspiration and authority but refuses to divorce these two words from the main purpose of the Bible, further revelation of the person of Jesus.

Key voices/leaders: Martin Luther King, Jr. Karl Barth, Scot McKnight, N.T. Wright, Lauren Winner, Sarah Coakley, Bonhoeffer, James Smith, Walter Brueggemann, Barbara Brown Taylor, Chuck Campbell, Walter Wink Richard Hays, Ian Cron, and Hans Urs von Balthasar. Oh, yeah. Bono.

VIEW #4: HUMANIST (The Bible is an inspiring document with varying levels of relevancy for coping with life in the modern world.)

(Here, I’m not using humanist in a decidedly negative fashion) God is whoever you think God to be or were taught God to be. If God exists at all. The “God” pursuit is almost exclusively subjective. In this view, the Bible, like the Qur’an, Torah, the writings of Baha’ll’a, and Bhagavad Gita, is simply one more sacred collection of spiritual moral writings meant to speak to life’s deep experiences of pain. While mostly the product of human engineering and imagination, the Bible is important because of its link to history, meaning, purpose, and identity. Not meant to be literal or pure history, the Bible functions as an important narrative for understanding the values and linguistic emphases of many modern westerners. Full of inspiration, the Bible’s authority should be regarded with great suspicion. It can be however, a guide-book for remarkable standards of ethics.

The widest group, the HUMANIST camp, ranges from Liberal Christians to passionate Atheists. “It [the Bible] is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies,” Mark Twain.

Key players/voices: Richard Rohr, Bart Erhman, Christopher Hitchens, the New Atheists, A.J. Levine, Post-Christian Americans and Europeans, Richard Rohr, Marcus Borg, Mark Twain, and Richard Dawkins. This is the most diverse list of all four categories.

I probably needed five categories but ran out of time (pastors have deadlines too).

Had to share this beauty in conclusion. Because, in a sense, everyone does this. Everyone who reads the Bible. Or used to read the Bible.


So, how do you read the Bible?



Shane Deal · 15 Sep ’14 at 10:03 am

I think view #3 is probably the closest to how it is for me. 🙂

    Christopher Hopper · 16 Sep ’14 at 10:21 am


    For whatever reason, Disqus disabled on me for this particular post. It’s back up now, but it means your original comment is no longer on display. I’m replying to you here on WP comments (which I don’t like, and much prefer Disqus), and via email so I know you actually get the response.

    I’ve been moving from #2 toward #3 for years now, but especially so in the last twelve months. Thanks for commenting, bro!


Erica · 15 Sep ’14 at 2:53 pm

How long have you used this comment system? I’d say I’m a blend of Evangelical and Third Way.

    Christopher Hopper · 16 Sep ’14 at 10:07 am


    Actually, I’ve been using Disqus lately, and for whatever reason, it disabled on me for this particular post. It’s back up now, but it means your original comment is no longer on display. I’m replying to you here on WP comments (which I don’t like, and much prefer Disqus), and via email so I know you actually get the response.

    I too and a blend of the middle two, but definitely migrating toward #3 from #2 the more I study, as I greatly respect such people as McKnight, Barth and Wright.

    Thanks for writing!


Gabe · 16 Sep ’14 at 9:32 am

I tend towards #3, although I do believe it’s 100% infallible and applicable to today, unless there are things that are understood to be specific to that time period (sacrifices in the OT, etc).

    Christopher Hopper · 16 Sep ’14 at 10:19 am


    For whatever reason, Disqus disabled on me for this particular post. It’s back up now, but it means your original comment is no longer on display. I’m replying to you here on WP comments (which I don’t like, and much prefer Disqus), and via email so I know you actually get the response.

    I think you’ve hit on a very good point, and often a sad misunderstanding, which you actually eluded to without actually saying it. If I could paraphrase, it’s: “I believe in the holiness and supremacy of scripture, but I also believe not everything applies to me today.” At first blush, this may actually sound like hearsay, but in reality, it’s incredible maturity. Everyone—and I mean everyone—interprets scripture. We all filter it, we all apply contextual understanding almost subconsciously. Even Jesus himself interpreted and redefined scripture! Think of all the places where he said, “You’ve heard it said…but I say unto you…” (Matthew 5:43-44 as just one of dozens of examples). He’s literally re-writing the Old Testament! Blasphemy!

    Just because we know that the earth doesn’t have a dome that rain falls through, nor does it sit on pillars, nor is it flat—as the Old Testament writers believed—doesn’t mean that the Bible is inerrant. It means that our understanding has increased; yet the principles remain supreme and unshakable.

    The beauty of God’s story of scripture is that he even allowed the humanness of man to co-labor with his Holy Spirit to encapsulate everything that is the Bible. Even when studying the Councils of the early Church, it’s amazing to see how His hand worked even amongst political charged Christians to preserve the “guts” of what he desired for us to have today. It’s a miracle.

    As always, thanks for chiming in.


Erica D Lehman · 16 Sep ’14 at 11:35 am

I think I’m mostly Evangelical with a trace of Third Way.

    Christopher Hopper · 16 Sep ’14 at 11:39 am

    Thanks for re-commenting, Erica.

    Yes, I’ve been raised #2 and migrating quickly to #3, as I highly respect the thought processes of Barth, McKnight and Wright.

      Erica D Lehman · 16 Sep ’14 at 11:42 am

      I used to be a Mennonite kid, but we became AG when I was in 7th grade. Visited that and some churches like before that.

        Christopher Hopper · 17 Sep ’14 at 8:31 pm

        My wife was raised Baptist, then their town went through a revival in the early 1990’s and they attended the local AG church.

          Erica D Lehman · 18 Sep ’14 at 11:28 am

          My mom’s oldest brother was Mennonite, then he and his wife (my aunt, also born Mennonite) became Baptist and their son, my cousin, as well as his family would be Baptist, I think. I have a Twitter friend whose family’s (maybe Southern) Baptist
          and some people that used to go to our Church now go to First Baptist. I also saw on this MercyMe (band I like) DVD one of those guys was Southern Baptist. My mom had some AG experience as a young woman and my dad went to some AG and AG-like churches in Louisiana, where his older sister, so my aunt lives in the 5 years he lived in her town there.

          Christopher Hopper · 22 Sep ’14 at 1:04 pm

          That’s quite the lineage of awesomeness 🙂

Comments are closed.